Ainstein for Schools
Ainstein adds a living mastery map, adaptive practice, and reviewable learning evidence to supported subjects and grade bands. Teachers see what each student understands, where a gap began, and what would show that it is closed.
The visibility gap
Schools already collect grades, assignments, and assessment data. The missing layer is a continuous view of prerequisite knowledge across subjects, teachers, and years.
A teacher sees each student for one subject, a few hours a week, alongside several other classes. Individual diagnosis and prerequisite repair compete with everything else the teacher must do.
The Year 8 teacher may inherit the consequence of a Year 6 gap without seeing where it began. A mastery map carries that history forward.
Teachers keep spreadsheets, annotations, and informal notes because they need a more precise picture. Ainstein turns that need into a shared, governed record.
Ainstein gives the school one continuous view of what the student understands and what should happen next.
One letter. No history, no cause, no map of what’s underneath.
Every skill and what it builds on: durable, fragile, missing, with its whole history. The map survives every handover.
The instrument
Your school keeps its curriculum, pedagogy, and identity. Ainstein supplies the instrument layer: map, practice, and evidence.
A living prerequisite graph for every child: what is durable, what is fragile, what is missing, and what each gap quietly blocks upstream. It follows the child across teachers, years, and subjects.
Daily practice generated from each child’s actual mistakes, aligned to what their class is teaching this week. International curricula first: IB MYP, Cambridge IGCSE and similar.
Progress is communicated through real learning evidence: what became solid, what stayed fragile, and what happens next.
The platform suggests practice, surfaces weak spots, and summarizes evidence. Your teachers approve consequential decisions and determine what counts as mastery.
Students use AI through approved learning tools, with guardrails, supervision, and parent-visible reporting. If the AI disappeared tomorrow, the maps, the evidence, and the teaching judgment would all still be yours.
Your school can adopt the mastery map, adaptive practice, and evidence layer without adopting the complete Ainstein school model. Scope is agreed before the pilot begins.
We are proving this in the open. Our Learning Support programme in Vienna runs the same instrument with families right now; the first anonymised before-and-after maps will appear on this page when they are real, and with permission, never before.
And when a parent shares their child’s map with a teacher, that is the demo we trust most. If you are that teacher: we would love to hear what you saw.
Ways to work together
Coverage expands subject by subject. Mathematics is the first licensed subject. English and additional subjects follow only when their prerequisite maps, practice libraries, and teacher-review workflows meet the same standard.
Start with one supported subject and grade band. We establish a baseline, align the curriculum, train the teachers, support implementation, and report what changed.
License supported subjects for agreed grade bands, with the mastery map, adaptive practice, teacher review tools, parent evidence, updates, training, and ongoing support.
Help shape a new curriculum mapping or school workflow through structured product input, early access, shared evaluation, and commercial terms agreed around the contribution.
Your school keeps: its curriculum, pedagogy, student relationships, teacher judgment, and institutional identity.
Ainstein supplies: the mastery-map engine, adaptive practice, evidence workflow, implementation support, and teacher training for the licensed scope.
Implementation
We begin with a subject, grade band, and curriculum already ready for implementation. Mathematics comes first, with IB MYP and Cambridge IGCSE among the initial mappings.
Schools define where AI can help, where it cannot, and which actions require teacher approval.
Teachers learn how to read evidence, intervene at the right moment, and use AI without surrendering judgment.
Begin with a grade band, subject, or support program before expanding across the school.
Parents and school leaders see clear evidence of practice, gaps closed, and skills that stayed durable.
Pilot scope, timeline, success measures, and evidence access are agreed together. Expansion follows demonstrated usefulness to teachers and students.
Pilots
A 30-minute conversation about your curriculum, current subject coverage, the visibility problem you want to solve, and a realistic starting scope.